Barry and I have been talking about doing a simple "campaign" framework for some Napoleonic games between us. As his collection is mostly Russians, he would obviously use them, and I would use French and French Allied troops (i.e, Confederation of the Rhine, Kingdom of Italy, Grand Duchy of Warsaw). Brent Oman has been working on ideas for an adaptation of his excellent Theater of War rules for Piquet campaigns for his Field of Battle ("Season of Battle"), but it seems unlikely that they will be available before the end of this year. Similarly, Bob Jones has many fascinating ideas for a Campaign system based upon Die Fighting ("Die Marching"), which he and I have discussed on several occasions the past 5 years or so, but it doesn't seem like we'll be seeing that any time soon either. That got me thinking about the ACW "Campaign" played by John and Adam, as detailed on John's Blog, using the system included in Sam Mustafa's* "Longstreet" rules. Thus inspired, I thought something based (only) upon my impression of Sam's ideas might be worth exploring. In deference to Sam's apparent fondness for Generals with a last name starting with L, as well as to the Marechal himself, I have termed this working project, "Lannes". It might just as well be Langeron, or Lichtenstein, or Lutzow, or Leith! We will be using Field of Battle 2nd edition for this project, although in many ways I think Die Fighting 2 might be even better suited to this concept. Food for thought there, Bob!
*Disclaimer: I'm not Sam (despite how many times he has changed his handle on TMP), nor do I play him on TV. I'm too cheap to buy a copy of Longstreet (no ACW armies or plans) to steal the actual ideas, but I have had dinner with him!
1799 (Suvarov in Italy)
1805 (Pre Austerlitz)
1806 (Post Jena - will probably set as more early 1807. i.e, circa Eylau)
1807 (Pre Freidland)
1812 (Pre Borodino)
1813 (endless scope!)
1814 (pre abdication)
(1815) N/A
I was thinking 2 "battles" per campaign "year". That would mean 14 games, which would doubtless take us a couple of years to play out. Therefore I think one game per "year" would be more realistic. The actual battles will be generated using the system in Field of Battle, 2nd edition. I was thinking of having the starting forces, troop and leader ratings, reinforcement types and amounts vary by both year and nationality, but upon due consideration I decided KISS definitely applied if we are ever to get this thing running. It also eliminates bias, conscious or otherwise. Still, it could be fun to try for a different twist! It is my intent that all the units and Generals in the campaign be named for added color, thus the 12th Ligne might have the nickname "Magnifique" or more whimsical identifiers might be used. Without further ado, ghere's the first draft of
3 Generals
10 units
Similarly, Leaders in Field of Battle have an LD rating which influences initiative, movement, and rallying for troops under that Leader. These have the same range as the CD above.
I am thinking that the troops and leaders would cluster at the lower end of the spectrum to start, and the same would be true of any reinforcements. However, units can improve (or sometimes worsen) in their ratings over time.
*Disclaimer: I'm not Sam (despite how many times he has changed his handle on TMP), nor do I play him on TV. I'm too cheap to buy a copy of Longstreet (no ACW armies or plans) to steal the actual ideas, but I have had dinner with him!
Jean Lannes (176 9- 1809)
MARÉCHAL DE L'EMPIRE, DUC DE MONTEBELLO
The idea is that we would each start as an aspiring officer in our respective armies - say a Major (Chef de Battalion) or Colonel, thrust into a position of higher command by influence and/or the incapacity of those senior to us. We would thus start in command of an augmented brigade of troops. After each battle, there would be the opportunity to gain in professional ability and/or subordinate commander(s), for the quality of our troops to improve (or decline), and for units to be added (and sometimes, detached from) our commands. The idea is that over time our command would increase to the size of a Corps with supporting troops.
Time Frame
During the years of the later Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, France and Russia were at war with one another in the following years:1799 (Suvarov in Italy)
1805 (Pre Austerlitz)
1806 (Post Jena - will probably set as more early 1807. i.e, circa Eylau)
1807 (Pre Freidland)
1812 (Pre Borodino)
1813 (endless scope!)
1814 (pre abdication)
(1815) N/A
I was thinking 2 "battles" per campaign "year". That would mean 14 games, which would doubtless take us a couple of years to play out. Therefore I think one game per "year" would be more realistic. The actual battles will be generated using the system in Field of Battle, 2nd edition. I was thinking of having the starting forces, troop and leader ratings, reinforcement types and amounts vary by both year and nationality, but upon due consideration I decided KISS definitely applied if we are ever to get this thing running. It also eliminates bias, conscious or otherwise. Still, it could be fun to try for a different twist! It is my intent that all the units and Generals in the campaign be named for added color, thus the 12th Ligne might have the nickname "Magnifique" or more whimsical identifiers might be used. Without further ado, ghere's the first draft of
LANNES
Starting troops:
1 C-in-C3 Generals
10 units
Rating the Troops and Leaders
In Field of Battle, each unit has a Defense Die type or DD rating (ranging from D4 (worst) to D6 (average), to D8 (elite), up to D10 (generally only senior Guard units). The DD is used primarily when a unit is shot at - thus a higher DD makes a unit less likely to suffer losses from enemy fire. It also modifies melee if my DD is higher than yours. Units also have a Combat DIe type or CD rating. This is the basis for shooting at the enemy, and engaging in melee combat. These range from D8 (poor) to D10 (average), D12 (good), to D12 +1 (excellent).Similarly, Leaders in Field of Battle have an LD rating which influences initiative, movement, and rallying for troops under that Leader. These have the same range as the CD above.
I am thinking that the troops and leaders would cluster at the lower end of the spectrum to start, and the same would be true of any reinforcements. However, units can improve (or sometimes worsen) in their ratings over time.
Unit Types
D12 Die Roll
|
Unit Type
|
1
|
National Guard*/Opolochenie*
|
2
|
Line Infantry
|
3
|
Line Infantry
|
4
|
Line Infantry
|
5
|
Line Infantry
|
6
|
Light Infantry
|
7
|
Light Infantry
|
8
|
Provisional Cavalry*/Cossacks*
|
9
|
Chasseurs
|
10
|
Dragoons
|
11
|
6 lber Foot Battery
|
12
|
6 lber Foot Battery
|
* = DD4C/D8 automatic, must be upgraded to become better than D4/D8.
Starting force must have at least 1 and no more than 2 Artillery units, at least 1 and no more than 3 Cavalry units, and at least 5 Infantry units. If necessary, re roll invalid unit results until one meeting the conditions is obtained.
Rating starting units and reinforcements
D12 Die Roll
|
DD rating
|
CD Infantry
|
CD Cav/Arty
|
1
|
D4
|
D8
|
D8
|
2
|
D4
|
D8
|
D8
|
3
|
D4
|
D8
|
D8
|
4
|
D4
|
D8
|
D10
|
5
|
D4
|
D8
|
D10
|
6
|
D4
|
D8
|
D10
|
7
|
D4
|
D10
|
D10
|
8
|
D4
|
D10
|
D10
|
9
|
D6
|
D8
|
D8
|
10
|
D6
|
D8
|
D8
|
11
|
D6
|
D8
|
D10
|
12
|
D6
|
D10
|
D10
|
Rating starting and replacement General: roll 2 D12’s, one blue, one red
D12 Die Roll
|
LD Type
|
D12 Die Roll
|
Special Characteristics
|
1
|
D8
|
1
|
Poltroon: Down 1 for all Rally rolls
|
2
|
D8
|
2
|
Epileptic: LD roll of 2 also = no move. May re-roll failed leader survival tests
(“I was only resting!”)
|
3
|
D8
|
3
|
Fabian: Down 1 die type for MOVE rolls.
On Each MOVE, note his LD score; units in his command must roll that score or less on D12 if they wish to move forward MORE than one segment. May ALWAYS expend a segment to change formation/facing, even on odd rolls
|
4
|
D8
|
4
|
None
|
5
|
D10
|
5
|
None
|
6
|
D10
|
6
|
None
|
7
|
D10
|
7
|
None
|
8
|
D10
|
8
|
None
|
9
|
D10
|
9
|
None
|
10
|
D10
|
10
|
Rash: Up 1 die type for MOVE rolls.
On Each MOVE, note his LD score; Infantry/Cavalry units in his command must roll that score or more on D12 if they wish to move forward LESS than half of the full number of segments rolled.
|
11
|
D12
|
11
|
Charismatic: Up 1 for all Rally rolls
|
12
|
D12
|
12
|
Heroic: all units in his Command Group get up 1 in Melee while he is in charge, but roll for Leader loss on D8 instead of D12
|
Post Battle Effects
Roll for each unit at the end of every battle
D12 Die Roll
|
Result
|
0 or less
|
DD down 1
|
1
|
CD down 1
|
2
|
CD down 1
|
3
|
No Change
|
4
|
No Change
|
5
|
No Change
|
6
|
CD up 1
|
7
|
CD up 1
|
8
|
CD up 1
|
9
|
CD up 1
|
10
|
CD up 1
|
11
|
CDD up 1
|
12
|
DD up 1
|
13
|
DD up 1
|
14
|
DD up 1
|
15+
|
Unit is transferred out - replace with new recruit of same general type!
|
D12 Modifiers:
Unit was routed at end of the battle (or destroyed/off table) -1
Unit caused rout or destruction of enemy unit +1 per such unit
Unit suffered no UI loss (all as of the end of battle) NC, but may re-roll x 1
Unit has 1 UI loss at end of the game +1
Unit has 2+ UI loss at end of game -1
--Per Morale Point left at end of game (by definition, will apply to the winning side only) +1 to that many rolls
Notes:
If DD already at D4 and reduction called for, reduce CD by 1 (lowest is CD 8)
If CD already D8 and reduction called for, reduce DD by 1 (lowest is D4)
If DD is already D10 (!) and increase called for, increase CD by 1 (max is D12 +2)
If CD is already at D12 +1 (or +2), increase DD by 1
National Guard/Opolchenie gaining an increase in DD or CD are instead promoted to Line infantry D4/D8
Provisional Cavalry/Cossacks are instead promoted to Chasseurs or Chevau-Leger Lanciers (French) or Dragoons or Uhlans (Russian) D4/D8 - player choice.
Infantry units reaching DD8 become Young/Middle Guard or Grenadiers
Chassuers/Mounted Jagers promoted to DD8 are re designated as “Hussars”
Dragoons promoted to DD8 are re designated “Cuirassiers”
Artillery who reach DD8 may also be designated as Horse Artillery
Artillery who reach CD12+1 are considered re-armed with 12lbers
Any units which reach DD10 become Guard units of that type.
Roll for each General lost in action at the end of every battle
D12 Die Roll
|
Result
|
1
|
“He’s Dead, Jean!”Roll a replacement
|
2
|
“He’s Dead, Jean!”Roll a replacement
|
3
|
“I’m not Dead Yet” - Serious Wound
|
4
|
“I’m not Dead Yet” - Serious Wound
|
5
|
“It’s just a Flesh Wound!”
|
6
|
“It’s just a Flesh Wound!”
|
7
|
“It’s just a Flesh Wound!”
|
8
|
Impregnated by Elephant:Concussion
|
9
|
Unhorsed
|
10
|
Unhorsed
|
11
|
Bullet stopped by portrait of Mistress
|
12
|
Bullet stopped by brandy flask
|
Then roll for each surviving General:
D12 Die Roll
|
Effect on General
|
0 or less
|
General becomes HEROIC
|
1
|
LD down 1 type
|
2
|
LD down 1 type
|
3
|
No change
|
4
|
No change
|
5
|
No change
|
6
|
No change
|
7
|
No change
|
8
|
LD up one type
|
9
|
LD up one type
|
10
|
LD up one type
|
11
|
LD up one type
|
12
|
LD up one type
|
13+
|
General becomes Charismatic
|
Modifiers:
Suffered Serious Wound -2
Suffered Flesh Wound -1
Uninjured NC
Concussion: NC; but also LOSE Special Characteristic if present, or Roll for chance of acquiring one if has none!
Unhorsed +1
General on winning side +1
Bullet Stopped +2
Schedule of Reinforcements
Year
|
Post Battle reinforcements
|
1799
|
2 units + 1 General
|
1805
|
3 units
|
1806
|
3 units + 1 General
|
1807
|
4 units
|
1812
|
2 units + 1 General
|
1813
|
1 unit
|
1814
|
N/A
|
For the French, at least one of the 1806 reinforcements must Confederation of the Rhine or Italian; at least one of the 1807 reinforcements must be Polish. This is purely for color and has no game effects, although I toyed with a chance of CoR/Italy defecting in 1813, and loss of both for 1814.
Like the ideas! You've inspired me to try similar with French Austrians. I was working on some leadership rules for my ACWs and might be able to port them over.
ReplyDeleteGlad to hear it. As I think about it, the scheme above is perhaps inspired as much by the old SSI 5 star general computer game series!
DeleteInteresting indeed
ReplyDeleteWe'll think about it, tweak bit a bit perhaps, then give it a go, I think!
DeleteNice.. unlikely to have an elephant on the table .:-) I think "He's dead Jim" translates to "He's dead, Jacques" (or perhaps the interesting diminutive "Jacot")
ReplyDeleteThe Elephant is of course a reference to Blucher's hallucinations. A whole new meaning to having "Seen the Elephant"!The "Jean" is a semi French-ification of Jim, yes, but of course also Lannes' first name!
DeleteThis is great! I might use it for a medieval Hostile Realms Campaign I've been toying with.
ReplyDeleteYes, it should be quite easy to adapt to HR; I shall have to keep that in mind myself!
DeleteThis will be an interesting exercise to follow. Peter. Generating battles within a campaign setting ought to add more depth and meaning to each, individual battle. Will both forces move through time in harmony or will fortunes of battle cause the two combatants to follow distinct and dichotomous paths? Will one force tend to dominate the other over time as victories lead to better commanders and units? Perhaps. the weaker force may need some sort of handicapping system to keep the games competitive? I am sure you have all of this thoroughly considered.
ReplyDeleteI will be watching!
Well, to borrow/paraphrase a line form Michael Feldman, your questions are carefully considered, but the answers have not. Both side s will necessarily have the same number of units at every stage of the project, but the composition and quality will vary. Yes, that could gradually build to be very difficult to overcome. Hopefully, I have designed the tables with enough variability, etc that that won't be an issue. Obviously, some momentum in needed or there would be no point in doing a linked series of battles. I suspect we'll just have to talk about it a bit, tweak as needed, and then just play the game! Hopefully many of the units and officers will develop personalities over the course of the series. Still to be determined is how to tell who "won". That shouldn't really be that difficult to do either. Ss I understand it, Longstreet uses "Epic Points" which relates as much to being "Mentioned in dispatches" as it does actual victory on the battlefield. I am inclined to just award 1 point for a minor victory, 2 points for a major victory, and 3 for ma decisive victory. Most battles result in minor victories in FoB terms.
DeleteExcellent idea. This name of course also relates to many of the campaigns I have played int: They tend to die off before we reach the culmination....
ReplyDeleteYes, that is the advantage of a less open ended approach. Seven games should be manageable, although it could take us 2 years to play them all!
DeleteI will be watching this closely, I have been think about a campaign system for Napoleonics for some time.
ReplyDeleteJohn
THanks, John! It is in l;arge part inspired by the reports of your own Longstreet and Dux Bellorum campaigns, although not as developed as those. The week point is scenario generation. I thought about using Grant's scenarios, but the force composition there would be far too variable. The FoB2 scenario generation system provides for some variation, but perhaps less than I might want. The easiest fix for that, I think is to make it easier for there to be outcomes in the 4 areas used. Barry and I are getting together tomorrow to set up the initial forces and probably schmooze a bit about some of these details.
DeleteWhen will be for sale? Will it be available also in PDF?
ReplyDeleteBrent's "Season of Battle" will likely be available by the end of this year. Don't know about "Die Marching". As for Lannes, you're looking at it right here - feel free to use it and adapt it as you like!
Delete