Barry and I got together for an hour or so this past Sunday (during an April snow storm!) to work out the final effects of the first battle of the campaign upon our forces, and set up the next battle.
FRANCE
Unit # | Unit Name | DD | CD | Routs Caused | Final UI loss | Routed, etc? | End Game Result | |
1 | Vendémiaire Line | D6 | D10 | 4 | Yes | CD Up 1 | ||
2 | Brumaire Line | D4 | D8 | 0 | NC | |||
3 | Angoulême Chasseur | D6 | D10 | 0 | CD Up 1 | |||
4 | Ardennes Light | D4 | D8 | 1 | CD Up 1 | |||
5 | Bordeaux Chasseur | D6 | D8 | 3 | Yes | CD Up 1 | ||
6 | Chaumont Chasseur | D6 | D10 | 1 | 0 | NC | ||
7 | Vertu 6# Ft Artillery | D4 | D8 | 1 | 2 | Yes | NC | |
8 | Génie 6# FA | D6 | D10 | 0 | CD Up 1 | |||
9 | Bouches-du-Rhône Light | D6 | D8 | 1 | DD Up 1 | |||
10 | Frimaire National Gde | D4 | D8 | 0 | Promoted to LINE | |||
11 | Nivôse Line | D4 | D10 | 2 | NC | |||
12 | Côte-d'Or Light | D6 | D8 | 0 | NC | |||
13 | Rhone Light | D6 | D10 | |||||
14 | Morvan RDragoon | D4 | D10 | |||||
General | Name | LD | Special | Hit? | Outcome | Year | End Game Result | |
C-in-C | Francois Faucon | D10 | - | 1799 | NC | Hawk | ||
A | Simeon Souris | D12 | Poltroon | 1799 | NC | Mouse | ||
B | Blaize Bassier | D8 | - | Yes | "He's Dead" | 1799 | Repl D12 Fabian | Bear |
C | Rene Renard | D10 | Fabian | LD Up 1 | Fox | |||
D | D12 | Fabian |
As I had 2 Morale points left at the end of the battle, I could add +1 to two unit rolls (or +2 to a single roll); in the event this had no effect upon the results. As can be seen, I did pretty well with my rolls, with more than half of the units receiving an upgrade. The starts listed are before any upgrades. I rolled downgrades on 2 units as well, #7 Artillery battery and #2 Line infantry, but as they were already as bad as they could be, that had no effect! General Bassier was, sadly, pronounced DOA ("Il est mort, Jacques!") at the field hospital, and will be replaced by General Fabien LaFerme.
As per the scheme set forth for our LANNES campaign, 2 new units and a new general were added to my forces, and I rolled them up as highlighted in blue above: yet another unit of Light Infantry (very Republican flavor to the force, no?), and another cavalry unit, this time a unit of Dragoons. The new general, Henri Hibou, rolled up with an LD of 12 (very good), but is now the THIRD Fabian general in my force. This will make it difficult to take full advantage Double and Triple "Magic Moves".
RUSSIA
Unit # | Unit Name | DD | CD | Routs Caused | Final UI loss | Routed, etc? | End Game Result |
1 | 1/Alexapol | D4 | D10 | ||||
2 | 3/Alexapol | D4 | D10 | ||||
3 | 1/Ingermannland | D4 | D10 | ||||
4 | 3/Ingermannland | D4 | D10 | ||||
5 | 6# Battery #1 | D6 | D12 | ||||
6 | 1/Smolensk | D6 | D8 | ||||
7 | 3/Somlensk | D4 | D10 | ||||
8 | 1/Simbriski | D4 | D10 | ||||
9 | 3/Simbriski | D4 | D8 | ||||
10 | 6# Battery #2 | D4 | D12 | ||||
11 | 1/20th Jager | D6 | D10 | ||||
12 | 1/21st Jager | D4 | D10 | ||||
13 | Siberia Dragoons | D6 | D10 | ||||
14 | Cossacks | D4 | D8 | ||||
General | Name | LD | Special | Hit? | Outcome | Year | End Game Result |
C-in-C | Boris Badenov | D10 | N/A | ||||
A | M. Smartov | D12+1 | N/A | ||||
B | Trembalalotsky | D10 | Epileptic | LD Roll of 2 = no move; re-roll officer survival | |||
C | Boramirov | D12 | N/A | ||||
D | Scardikatzky | D8 | Poltroon | Down 1 for Rally Rolls |
Barry did his list a bit differently, so this is the final result of the entire post battle process and reorganization of his commands. He added a Cossack unit and another Line unit. General Boramirov's injuries were determined to be a concussion; as a result he did more than "See the Elephant", he believed that he had been impregnated by one! Perhaps not surprisingly, the men under his command now view him as being rather more unbalanced than Heroic!
We then went on to set up the second battle of the campaign, which conceptually takes place in 1805, prior to Austerlitz. Using the process in Field of Battle, first we did the Fate rolls:
French
D4
|
Decision Area
|
D12
|
Narrative
|
Effect
|
4
|
Deployment
|
`12
|
Approach March
|
Up 1
|
3
|
Reconnaissance
|
12
|
Cavalry Screen
|
Up 1
|
1
|
Tactical Adjustment
|
5
|
Outposts
|
Down 1
|
Russian
D4
|
Decision Area
|
D12
|
Narrative
|
Effect
|
4
|
Deployment
|
2
|
Withdraw
|
Down 1
|
1
|
Tactical Adjustment
|
7
|
Threatening
|
Up 1
|
3
|
Reconnaissance
|
1
|
Poor Reconnaissance
|
Down 1
|
Applying those adjustments to the allocation of our 4 Command Die Types (D10, D10, D8, and D6), gave the final die types and results as below:
Area
|
Fr Die
|
Fr Roll
|
Russ Die
|
Russ Roll
|
Result
|
Tactical
|
D4 (6)
|
6
|
D8 (6)
|
7
|
2 of winner’s Cmd groups may do Tactical Adjustment
|
Strength
|
D10
|
10
|
D10
|
3
|
⅛ of loser’s Cmd groups late
D4+D6 MOVES (=5)
|
Recon
|
D12 (10)
|
10
|
D10
|
7
|
Winner adds one zone for Deployment
|
Deploy
|
D8 (10)
|
6
|
D8
|
7
|
NE; winner gets to choose table orientation or side
|
Thus it seems that a swift French approach march, coupled with a poorly executed withdrawal by the Russians, has resulted in a battle. The superior French cavalry screen resulted in poor Reconnaissance for the Russians, and thus the French will add an additional Deployment zone when the troops are set down. This means in one sector, French troops may be up to half way across the table at the outset! To make matters once, it seems that one of the Russian Command Groups was already well into the withdrawal, and must be recalled and will reach the battlefield only after a considerable delay. The only redeeming aspect is that the threatening conduct of the cornered Russian troops, coupled with consumption of rather too much wine by the French outposts, means that the Russians will be better able to make last minute adjustments to their tactical arrangements immediately before the battle commences.
We then went on to generate a Warplan 5/5 district for the battle. We actually did 3 in case the first two were unsuitable (deep sea, lake, etc). In the event, our first roll was fine: 8A.23
The Battle will take place in 8A.23; surrounding districts shown for overview purposes only.
As you can see, the battlefield is pretty open, just roads and some woods. The Warplan 5/5 Atlas describes the district as "soft cultivated land with fences and ditches", so we'll add some of those to break up the table.
The surrounding squares are a bit more interesting -
17 - Firm grazing land, Palatial mansion, River fordable during June, July, August
18 - Firm Grazing land, Farm. Cottage. Fences
19 - Firm grazing land. Ruined Abbey on Hill.
22 - Firm grazing land. Fences. Farm. River Deep. Stone Bridge (Max loading).
24 - Rocky terrain with three stone quarries and 2 sets of sheds.
The nearest village (not shown) is Loverna; Thus this may be known as the Battle of Loverna and Shurleigh Fields...
Snow in April, even in Southern New England, isn't that unusual, and it wasn't too bad when we got together on Sunday. But it got very cold and snowed AGAIN all day Monday, and this is what the garden looked like by 6PM!
And the rest of the back yard, too!
By comparison,it was 60 degrees on Easter a week before - wild violets in bloom.
and also Daffodils in bloom
not to mention some Pickwick crocuses.
Finally, back in Ithaca, NY in February on Valentine's Day, here is a shot of Taughannock Falls at zero degrees F! Still. the weather is part of what makes living in a "Temperate" climate fun!
With good French recon and good deployments, will this battle share the fate of the Austrian Ulm? Should be interesting!
ReplyDeleteI would think the Russians would be at a significant disadvantage, between the relatively open nature of the terrain, the late arriving command group, the opportunity for the French to have some troops in an advanced position, and my cavalry superiority. However, as in war itself, advantages hardly guarantee victory, eh?!
DeleteYes, the Russian's probably are at a significant disadvantage. Which is why this may be the first (and probably only?) battle my dismounted Dragoons see action on the table.
DeleteAt the same time, all the Fabian French commanders may make it a challenge to Carpe the Diem! :-)
DeleteLovely work again Peter, and I very much like the shade of blue you have used on them. I really would like to get the last of my Portuguese finished so I can move on to some of Roger's figures myself, and these examples are providing just the additional motivation I need.
ReplyDeleteI wish it would cool down here in Brisbane - nearly the middle of April and six weeks into autumn, and we are still above 30 degrees Celsius...
I think the Blue is Delta CC Pthalo Blue. It is a bit darker than it looks in the pictures, but definitely more "blue" tone than CC Prussian blue, and without the slight greenish tint that has. It is of course deliberately a lighter shade than the actual uniforms would have been. The weather will of course change in due course,right?
DeleteIt's a lovely shade, and I really must try some of those Delta colours. With regard to the weather, I am starting to doubt whether it will change, although I'm sure that in around four months we'll all be moaning about how cold it is.
Deleteyes, I like the shade of blue - dark, but still easy to tell it's blue and not black. Yes, fickle creatures that we are, you'll soon complain of the cold as we will of the heat, LOL!
Delete